@article {steggle_cruces_2014,
	title = {The Cruces of Measure for Measure and EEBO-TCP},
	journal = {The Review of English Studies},
	year = {2014},
	note = {00000},
	month = {jan},
	pages = {hgt120},
	abstract = {Matthew Steggle begins with article by breaking down the benefits and drawbacks of the EEBO-TCP project. Steggle argues that the quality of transcription, illusion of comprehensiveness, and influence of remediation are all challenges. However, the (eventual) open access to the materials and the ability to measure/quantify literary queries make the project worthwhile. Steggle uses Shakespeare{\textquoteright}s Measure for Measure as a case study to illustrate the usefulness of EEBO-TCP. He asserts that the crux of Measure for Measure is the vast differences in various textual "interpretation(s) and emendations." EEBO-TCP helps to reconcile or add evidence to these debates through frequency searches, comparative research, variant forms searches. Steggle argues that EEBO-TCP "seems to give a new purchase on old textual problems" by showcasing what evidence is persuasive and providing access to writings beyond the canon. },
	issn = {0034-6551, 1471-6968},
	doi = {10.1093/res/hgt120},
	url = {http://res.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/01/02/res.hgt120},
	author = {Steggle, Matthew}
}