@article {murphy_shakespeare_2010,
	title = {Shakespeare Goes Digital: Three Open Internet Editions},
	journal = {Shakespeare Quarterly},
	volume = {61},
	number = {3},
	year = {2010},
	note = {00001 {\textless}p{\textgreater}Volume 61, Number 3, Fall 2010{\textless}/p{\textgreater}},
	pages = {401{\textendash}414},
	abstract = {This article by Andrew Murphy discusses the merits and challenges of three, open-access, digital editions of Shakespeare. Murphy begins with Johnson{\textquoteright}s Open Source Shakespeare. Johnson{\textquoteright}s site builds upon the work of Farrow and Hylton but leveraging a "much wider range of programming tools now available to computer specialists" to enhance features like the search function. The best characteristic of Open Source Shakespeare is its integration of text tools. The downfall of Open Source Shakespeare comes in its choice of base text, which makes it "fundamentally (and often fatally) outdated." Shakespeare{\textquoteright}s Words also falls into the problem of working around a less than up-to-date version of the text. While the interface is clean and navigable, the collaborations with a commercial publisher means that there is a "certain amount of hard sell on the site." Finally, Murphy explores the Internet Shakespeare Editions, started by Michael Best in 1996. Overall, Murphy finds the work on the site patchy and incoherent. The greatest potential for the Internet Shakespeare Editions lies in its treatment of variance; however, inconsistencies remain a core problem. To conclude, Murphy seems to suggest that you get what you pay for - or what you don{\textquoteright}t pay for. },
	issn = {1538-3555},
	doi = {10.1353/shq.2010.0004},
	url = {http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/shakespeare_quarterly/v061/61.3.murphy.html},
	author = {Murphy, Andrew}
}