@article {prescott_consumers_2011,
	title = {Consumers, creators or commentators? Problems of audience and mission in the digital humanities},
	journal = {Arts and Humanities in Higher Education},
	year = {2011},
	note = {00006},
	month = {dec},
	pages = {1474022211428215},
	abstract = {In this article, Andrew Prescott references Juola{\textquoteright}s shocking publication that cast the digital humanities as a small, peripheral, discipline unable to register any significant scholarship in the general field because of its unimportant topics. Despite the biting critique launched by Juola, Prescott finds some merit in the accusations and argues that, in order to be relevant, digital humanities must contribute to the current scholarly debates in the humanities, more generally. Citing McGann, Prescott argues that in many ways the digital humanities community operates as an isolated island and this prevents any possibility of making a significant impact. For example, Prescott acknowledges that journals like DHQ are {\textquotedblleft}seriously out of touch with the modern study of the humanities{\textquotedblright} because they fail to engage with key disciplinary themes or questions. In conclusion, Prescott asserts that the digital humanities must move from {\textquotedblleft}technical method{\textquotedblright} to {\textquotedblleft}intellectual territory{\textquotedblright} in order to make an impact. },
	issn = {1474-0222, 1741-265X},
	doi = {10.1177/1474022211428215},
	url = {http://ahh.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/11/30/1474022211428215},
	author = {Prescott, Andrew}
}