@article {ullyot_digital_2013,
	title = {Digital Humanities Projects},
	journal = {Renaissance Quarterly},
	volume = {66},
	number = {3},
	year = {2013},
	note = {00001},
	month = {sep},
	pages = {937{\textendash}947},
	abstract = {This paper addresses the question of how digital databases should function in the circulation of academic information, and ability of evaluating the promotion or tenure for leader investigators on such projects. In this review, Ullyot assesses five databases related to scholarship between the Middle Ages and the Enlightenment. Ullyot also focused in on resources that have significantly updated their coverages or design in the past two years. This hones in on one of the key differences between a digital database and a monograph: the ability to evolve. In conclusion, Ullyot points out that these databases represent the new ways of engaging with and accessing information.},
	issn = {0034-4338},
	doi = {10.1086/673587},
	url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/673587},
	author = {Ullyot, Michael}
}