@article {marr_british_2012,
	title = {British Printed Images to 1700; Printed Images in Early Modern Britain, ed. Michael Hunter; The Print in Early Modern England: An Historical Oversight, by Malcolm Jones},
	journal = {The English Historical Review},
	volume = {{CXXVII}},
	number = {526},
	year = {2012},
	note = {00000},
	month = {jun},
	pages = {712{\textendash}717},
	abstract = {In this article, Alexander Marr reviews the British Printed Images to 1700 (BPI) database and two print resources. Marr praises the print resource{\textquoteright}s "willingness to look beyond the single-sheet art print and the genre of portraiture to establish the larger domain of early modern English printed images" but asserts that it overlooked a great deal. Marr sees BPI as helping to fill these gaps by making a most important contribution to the field. BPI aims to create a "representative (but not comprehensive) corpus of British printed images before 1700." Overall, Marr argues that this database is a great success: the {\textquoteright}Research{\textquoteright} section is robust, {\textquoteright}Resources{\textquoteright} section is helpful, and the digital images are of a high quality. The monograph that accompanies this databaseis comprised of sixteen essays regarding images and seventeenth-century English Culture. Marr{\textquoteright}s review of the{\textquoteright} publication praises the "monumental book" for "reproducing so many and such varied prints." Together, Marr sees these three resources as spurring scholars to "re-evaluate images and techniques of long-standing interest to their subject."},
	issn = {0013-8266, 1477-4534},
	doi = {10.1093/ehr/ces086},
	url = {http://ehr.oxfordjournals.org/content/CXXVII/526/712.short},
	author = {Marr, Alexander}
}
