@article {newton_comparison_2010,
	title = {A Comparison of the Iter Bibliography and the International Medieval Bibliography},
	journal = {Reference \& User Services Quarterly},
	volume = {49},
	number = {3},
	year = {2010},
	note = {00001},
	month = {mar},
	pages = {265{\textendash}277},
	abstract = {This article conducts several comparative experiments studying the usefulness, strengths, and materials archived in the Iter and International Medieval bibliographies. Newton and Tellman argue that because no comparative research has been carried out, their exploration is filling a gap in scholarship. Newton and Tellman approach their study of the databases through three different methods: an article search, a dissertation search, and a keyword search. Overall, the results showed that Iter performed better on both the journal and dissertation searches. On the keyword search, the databases performed equally but excelled in providing material for opposing areas. The authors conclude that users should consult both resources for the best and fullest results.},
	doi = {10.5860/rusq.49n3.265},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/rusq.49n3.265},
	author = {Newton, Daniel and Tellman, Jennalyn}
}