@article {borgman_scholarly_2005,
	title = {Scholarly communication and bibliometrics},
	journal = {Annual Review of Information Science and Technology},
	volume = {36},
	number = {1},
	year = {2005},
	note = {00000},
	pages = {2{\textendash}72},
	abstract = {In this article, Borgman and Furner examine the effects of digital scholarship on bibliometrics. Borgman and Furner assert that "scholarly communication is being transformed through the use of [...] information technologies". Bergman and Furner argue that bibiometrics has risen in popularity as citation analysis, econometrics, social network analysis, and quantitative approaches have gained popularity. What is less clear, however, is have these changes in technology altered human behaviour? This article endeavours to seek out how "the communicative activity of scholars" has transformed with the rise of the digital and how bibliometrics methodologies may be altered and used to support these changes. They found that evaluative bibliometrics continues to receive the most attention. The "most promising developments are new theories of citation-related behavior." Overall, Borgman and Furner report that "trends in scholarly communication and bibliometrics reflect larger trends in social science and technology research."},
	issn = {00664200},
	doi = {10.1002/aris.1440360102},
	url = {http://works.bepress.com/furner/1/},
	author = {Borgman, Christine L. and Furner, Jonathan}
}