@article {fitzpatrick_peerpeer_2010,
	title = {Peer-to-peer Review and the Future of Scholarly Authority},
	journal = {Social Epistemology},
	volume = {24},
	number = {3},
	year = {2010},
	note = {00016},
	pages = {161{\textendash}179},
	abstract = {In this article, Kathleen Fitzpatrick explores shifts in peer review practices as publishing goes digital. Fitzpatrick controversially argues that digital peer review and publishing practices should not be echoes of our current print framework. Instead, she asserts that scholars should take advantage of the shifting authority and real-world practices of the digital medium to change peer review for the better. Fitzpatrick discusses alternative models such as pre-print review and open review platforms. She argues that the central motivation behind peer review - that one{\textquoteright}s work should be evaluated by one{\textquoteright}s peers - is a good one but that the development and maintenance of a reliable online community is essential for the carrying out of this practice. },
	issn = {0269-1728},
	doi = {10.1080/02691728.2010.498929},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2010.498929},
	author = {Fitzpatrick, Kathleen}
}