@article {rodriguez_convergence_2006,
	title = {The convergence of digital libraries and the peer-review process},
	journal = {Journal of Information Science},
	volume = {32},
	number = {2},
	year = {2006},
	note = {00070},
	pages = {149{\textendash}159},
	abstract = {This article discusses alternative peer review models for pre-print materials and publications. The article begins by asserting how fundamental the process of peer review is to academic knowledge production and circulation. The authors also identify the four key players in academic peer review: author, editor, publisher, and reviewer. This article looks at various models of peer review such as staged review, interactive review, and journal banks. The final alternate review model that is proposed uses authorship networks and metadata records to identify, rank, and organize reviewers for publications. This repository model of peer review promotes community feedback.},
	keywords = {open archives initiative, peer-review process, pre-print repositories, {OAI}-{PMH}},
	issn = {0165-5515, 1741-6485},
	doi = {10.1177/0165551506062327},
	url = {http://jis.sagepub.com/content/32/2/149},
	author = {Rodriguez, Marko A. and Bollen, Johan and Sompel, Herbert Van de}
}