@article {arms_what_2002,
	title = {What Are The Alternatives To Peer Review? Quality Control in Scholarly Publishing on the Web},
	journal = {Journal of Electronic Publishing},
	volume = {8},
	number = {1},
	year = {2002},
	note = {00067},
	abstract = {In this article William Y. Arms discusses the state and practices of information review on the web. Arms asserts that while there is a lot of unreliable, sloppy, and simply terrible information on the Internet, there is also a lot of quality research - and the distinction between the two is not always as apparent as you would think. Arms focuses on the status of peer review. Arms argues that the varying degrees of peer review place resources on a spectrum of quality instead of decidedly categorizing these sources as the best of the best. In our quest as researchers to seek "Internet gold", it is paramount that we considering looking outside of the peer review framework to come in contact with some superior resources subject to other reviewing systems. Arms suggests that we look for resources where the publisher is the creator, where there is great editorial control, and where reputations are highly regarded.  },
	keywords = {Digital Scholarly Communication},
	issn = {1080-2711},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0008.103},
	url = {http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3336451.0008.103},
	author = {Arms, William Y.}
}