@article {ore_monkey_2004,
	title = {Monkey Business{\textemdash}or What is an Edition?},
	journal = {Literary and Linguistic Computing},
	volume = {19},
	number = {1},
	year = {2004},
	note = {00013},
	month = {apr},
	pages = {35{\textendash}44},
	abstract = {In this article, Ore responds to Peter Robinson{\textquoteright}s (assumed) claim that the only worthwhile textual editions are those that advanced scholarly criticism. Ore refutes this argument by demonstrating how scholarly editions can be valuable research tools despite their lack of critical appeal. To conclude this article, Ore recounts and builds about Edward Vanhoutte{\textquoteright}s criteria for an electronic, scholarly edition. },
	issn = {0268-1145, 1477-4615},
	doi = {10.1093/llc/19.1.35},
	url = {http://llc.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/1/35},
	author = {Ore, Espen S.}
}