Tools for a New Generation of Scholarly Edition Unified by a Tei-based Interchange Format Kochumman, R., Monroy C., Deng J., Furuta R., & Urbina E. (2004). Tools for a New Generation of Scholarly Edition Unified by a Tei-based Interchange Format. Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. 368–369.
Electronic scholarly editing Smith, M. Nell (2004). Electronic scholarly editing. (Siemens, R., & Schreibman S., Ed.).A Companion to Digital Literary Studies. 306–322.
Journal of Early Modern Studies : 1, 2012 [Anonymous] (2012). Journal of Early Modern Studies : 1, 2012. Journal of Early Modern Studies.. 1, 1–237.
Edition, Project, Database, Archive, Thematic Research Collection: What's in a Name? Price, K. M. (2009). Edition, Project, Database, Archive, Thematic Research Collection: What's in a Name?. 3,
What text really is not, and why editors have to learn to swim Robinson, P. (2009). What text really is not, and why editors have to learn to swim. Literary and Linguistic Computing. 24, 41–52.
American Literature Scholar in the Digital Age [Anonymous] (2011). American Literature Scholar in the Digital Age. (Earhart, A. E., & Jewell A., Ed.).
Theorizing the Digital Scholarly Edition Gabler, H. Walter (2010). Theorizing the Digital Scholarly Edition. Literature Compass. 7, 43–56.
A rationale of digital documentary editions Pierazzo, E. (2011). A rationale of digital documentary editions. Literary and Linguistic Computing.
Digital Facsimiles: Reading the William Blake Archive Viscomi, J. (2002). Digital Facsimiles: Reading the William Blake Archive. Computers and the Humanities. 36, 27–48.
Electronic Editions and the Needs of Readers Lavagnino, J. (1997). Electronic Editions and the Needs of Readers. Critical Survey. 9, 70–77.
