The Nine Flavours of Open Access Scholarly Publishing Willinsky, J. (2003). The Nine Flavours of Open Access Scholarly Publishing. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine. 49, 263.
Defrosting the Digital Library: Bibliographic Tools for the Next Generation Web Hull, D., Pettifer S. R., & Kell D. B. (2008). Defrosting the Digital Library: Bibliographic Tools for the Next Generation Web. PLoS Computational Biology. 4,
Scholarly publishing, peer review and the Internet Roberts, P. (1999). Scholarly publishing, peer review and the Internet. First Monday. 4,
Defining and Characterizing Open Peer Review: A Review of the Literature Ford, E. (2013). Defining and Characterizing Open Peer Review: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Scholarly Publishing. 44, 311–326.
Electronic publishing of professional articles: Attitudes of academics and implications for the scholarly communication industry Schauder, D. (1994). Electronic publishing of professional articles: Attitudes of academics and implications for the scholarly communication industry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45, 73–100.
What Are The Alternatives To Peer Review? Quality Control in Scholarly Publishing on the Web Arms, W. Y. (2002). What Are The Alternatives To Peer Review? Quality Control in Scholarly Publishing on the Web. Journal of Electronic Publishing. 8,
The rapid evolution of scholarly communication Odlyzko, A. (2002). The rapid evolution of scholarly communication. Learned Publishing. 15, 7–19.
The convergence of digital libraries and the peer-review process Rodriguez, M. A., Bollen J., & Van de Sompel H. (2006). The convergence of digital libraries and the peer-review process. Journal of Information Science. 32, 149–159.
Peer‐to‐peer Review and the Future of Scholarly Authority Fitzpatrick, K. (2010). Peer‐to‐peer Review and the Future of Scholarly Authority. Social Epistemology. 24, 161–179.
